So decided to go BBK, pipe, tranny and carb with one of our RH50's. After beating around the web for days trying to source info I came up with a ton of disputed info. Even called Scooterworks and they too were wrong.
Starting at the intake/carb. Most everyone suggests a 17.5mm carb in the forums. Don't really want to go with a pod type filter as I want to keep it stock looking. Called a bunch of distributors including Scooterworks and asked what size the stock carb is on a 2012 Roughhouse. All of them said it was 13mm.....ding ding.....wrong!!
Pulled the carb and measured it. It is 16.5mm at it's smallest dimension. COOL I thought!! No sense in spending dollars on a carb/AF pod/cable for one measly mm. Especially since it will be only a street/mild port setup.
Now on to the intake manifold. Measured the intake and it is a whopping 23.35mm at it's smallest dimension. VERY COOL I thought. Absolutely nothing to do up front!!....
Going over all of the posts here on MB there seems to be quite a variance of sizes related to the Buddy/RH 50's. Especially posts from Rattler 110cc folks who state their intakes are at only 19-20mm stock.
So from this I conclude the Genuine is supplying High Performance parts on their 2T 50's lately as stock. This confirms why we smoked a China 2T 50cc the other evening....I mean it wasn't even close.....
Anyone feel that bumping the carb from a 16.5mm to a 17.5mm is even worth it? And...on the other end how about this Stage 6 exhaust for a mild/streeter?
http://enviromoto.ecrater.com/p/9778324 ... horizontal[/img]
Some interesting info while getiing all BBK with a 2012 RH50
Moderator: Modern Buddy Staff
-
- Member
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 12:24 am
- Location: Central MA
Some interesting info while getiing all BBK with a 2012 RH50
<a href="http://www.fuelly.com/driver/SteveK/roughhouse" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.fuelly.com/sig-us/74241.png" width="500" height="63" alt="Fuelly" title="Share and compare MPG at Fuelly" border="0"/></a>
- bigbropgo
- Member
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:41 am
- Location: gotham city and the 801
-
- Member
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 12:24 am
- Location: Central MA
Yes BigBro these are all ID measurements. There is a blip on the Genuine literature where they speak of improved performance this year. Maybe this is why? I'll snag some pictures and post them later on today.
Initailly I thought maybe they are using excess 110cc parts on the 50's while they wind down 2T production. Just to get rid of them. The P/N on the intake manifold only contains the first several numbers and doesn't include the last four that would denote the difference between the 110 and the 50...
Initailly I thought maybe they are using excess 110cc parts on the 50's while they wind down 2T production. Just to get rid of them. The P/N on the intake manifold only contains the first several numbers and doesn't include the last four that would denote the difference between the 110 and the 50...
<a href="http://www.fuelly.com/driver/SteveK/roughhouse" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.fuelly.com/sig-us/74241.png" width="500" height="63" alt="Fuelly" title="Share and compare MPG at Fuelly" border="0"/></a>
- bigbropgo
- Member
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:41 am
- Location: gotham city and the 801
cool. i wasn't questioning just checking. seams like these machines are a flipping mystery sometimes. millimeters here and there make them different from any other 2t out there. sometimes i wish the motor was just a straight rip off of the bws or zuma. that way when genuine or pgo finally let this model go by the wayside, parts will be as close as a yamaha dealer. no such luck.
no i don't ride a scooter, i am a scooter pilot!
VICTUS MORTUUS VENATOR
VICTUS MORTUUS VENATOR
-
- Member
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:21 pm
- Location: Taylor, Mi