+1!!!jfrost2 wrote:I dont like this statement at all, what happened back then to a certain bike was pure accident, anyone would just assume it was bad gas/vapor lock and try turning the bike on again, it's just human nature. If I would have known it was oil originally, of course I wouldnt have started the motor on the bike. But I think bringing this event back into discussion to help defend yourself is very childish when it has absolutely nothing to do with the matter. Also, my age has nothing to do with this topic, so just because I may be much younger than most members, it doesnt mean I dont have common sense.
Come on, man, that was clearly a low blow. I've read the other thread before, and
1) When someone burns an engine up, that's enough injury without Monday morning quarterbacking
2) jfrost explained the situation quite well. To phrase it "he starts motors without oil to see where the leak is" implies that they knew there WAS an oil leak, which was NOT the case - if you want to bring up a really old mistake to go after credibility, please at least phrase it accurately
I'm not interested in getting into a war of words - late night, we all get cranky. Let's just let this thing drop here, ok?
I'm with illnoise - there's no point in hammering on this thing anymore.
EPA mandate>>Vapor Recovery hose
Overfill Fuel Tank>>submerge hose>>Vapor Lock>>stall.
It's not rocket science.