All about the WOT
Moderator: Modern Buddy Staff
- Swordsman
- Member
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:53 pm
- Location: White, GA, USA
All about the WOT
I apologize if anyone is getting sick of seeing all my dumb noob questions, but these super-small displacement engines and CVTs are a complete mystery to me.
I know on larger bikes, WOT ("wide open throttle", for any other noobs that might not have come across that abbreviation) is generally asking for trouble. Most modern bikes have enough power that they can easily sling themselves into a million pieces, hence the rev limiters on fuel injected, computer controlled models.
Lower power engines, however, aren't necessarily in the same danger of self destructing. My Ural, for example, only has 40 hp. At WOT, it might do 70 mph. It's turning some pretty high rpms, but it could run indefinitely that way (or it could break... Ural build quality and 1940's technology is always a gamble, but that's almost beside the point for this discussion). The engine simply doesn't have enough "oomph" to spin any faster, so the danger of slinging it apart is less than that of the high powered engines.
So, my question to the scooter gurus is this: just how bad is it to wring the snot out of them? Are these engines weak enough that they run out of rpms before they're dangerously high? Or is running a scooter hard living on borrowed time?
~SM
I know on larger bikes, WOT ("wide open throttle", for any other noobs that might not have come across that abbreviation) is generally asking for trouble. Most modern bikes have enough power that they can easily sling themselves into a million pieces, hence the rev limiters on fuel injected, computer controlled models.
Lower power engines, however, aren't necessarily in the same danger of self destructing. My Ural, for example, only has 40 hp. At WOT, it might do 70 mph. It's turning some pretty high rpms, but it could run indefinitely that way (or it could break... Ural build quality and 1940's technology is always a gamble, but that's almost beside the point for this discussion). The engine simply doesn't have enough "oomph" to spin any faster, so the danger of slinging it apart is less than that of the high powered engines.
So, my question to the scooter gurus is this: just how bad is it to wring the snot out of them? Are these engines weak enough that they run out of rpms before they're dangerously high? Or is running a scooter hard living on borrowed time?
~SM
- Syd
- Member
- Posts: 4686
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:41 am
- Location: Tempe
I ride my Fiddle WOT most all the time to keep up w/traffic on my commute. So far, so good :knockwood:
I think that the CDI includes rev limitation, so that you really wring the snot out of them. And the Buddy, Mr BigFoot, is about as bulletproof a scoot as there is out there.
I think that the CDI includes rev limitation, so that you really wring the snot out of them. And the Buddy, Mr BigFoot, is about as bulletproof a scoot as there is out there.
The majority is always sane - Nessus
- Uncle Groucho
- Member
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 2:21 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
My commute is short, so the few minutes I ride WOT is tempered with a red light or stop sign here and there. Could I have broken in my engine more gently and received slightly better MPG if I had kept it about 60% throttle? Sure. Has it be loads of fun cranking the right hand and feeling the scooter pick up the pace? Why, yes; yes it has been.
- agrogod
- Member
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:29 pm
- Location: Rancho Cordova, CA
I think the only real problem here is extended WOT, let's say 2-6 hrs of non-stop riding without a cool down break, day in and day out, everyday would do your engine in. Since the engines in most scooters are air cooled not giving them a rest after extended WOT is just looking for trouble.
I ride 9 miles to work, most of it WOT, no problems (yet)
.
I ride 9 miles to work, most of it WOT, no problems (yet)

"When your mouth is yapping your arms stop flapping, get to work" - a quote from my father R.I.P..
always start with the simple, it may end up costing you little to nothing
always start with the simple, it may end up costing you little to nothing
- Syd
- Member
- Posts: 4686
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:41 am
- Location: Tempe
Which brings to mind RobTaylor's Cannonball Buddy in 2008, I think. Bone stock except for an additional 2gal tank, I think. Allowed him to run for 2-300 miles at a stretch, all WOT. Prevailing opinion is the extended periods without any time for cool-down is what did him in after all but about 50 miles of cross country travel in about a week.agrogod wrote:I think the only real problem here is extended WOT, let's say 2-6 hrs of non-stop riding without a cool down break, day in and day out, everyday would do your engine in. Since the engines in most scooters are air cooled not giving them a rest after extended WOT is just looking for trouble.
I ride 9 miles to work, most of it WOT, no problems (yet).
I'd say for normal use, the Buddy will serve you well, even wide open.
The majority is always sane - Nessus
- Raiderfn311
- Member
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:12 am
- Location: North Carolina
When I rode a 50cc, I rode WOT all the time. Thats not what you want to do for engine longevity. I have not gone WOT on my Buiddy 150 for extended periods of time. Would you drive a car WOT? Well, we all have, but im just sayin.
The Edge....there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who truly know where it is have gone over. -Hunter S. Thompson
- Howardr
- Member
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:42 am
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Contact:
1000 miles in just under 24 hours. I rode WOT the entire time except when stopped for fuel.
That should answer your question. The scooter mentioned in the above post about the Cannonball was done with a 125 with no oil cooler. We honestly didn't know if my Buddy could do this or not, but it did and with no ill effects.
Howard
That should answer your question. The scooter mentioned in the above post about the Cannonball was done with a 125 with no oil cooler. We honestly didn't know if my Buddy could do this or not, but it did and with no ill effects.
Howard
Iron Butt Association Member Number 42256
Club - The Sky Island Riders.
Publisher: The Scooter 'Zine thescooterzine.com
Club - The Sky Island Riders.
Publisher: The Scooter 'Zine thescooterzine.com
- viney266
- Member
- Posts: 2270
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 8:49 pm
- Location: westminster md
- Contact:
^^^ wow...I'm impressed. I've done 1,000 in 24 on a motorcycle a few times. But , THAT, is impressive on a buddy 125...not that it is EVER easy.
I think HEAT is the killer. If you run good oil and keep it from overheating I think it will take it. Keep up the maintenance. As others have said. I think short bursts of wOT are fine...apparently it can even take long runs ,too. I would still feel better with an oil cooler for that kind of running
I think HEAT is the killer. If you run good oil and keep it from overheating I think it will take it. Keep up the maintenance. As others have said. I think short bursts of wOT are fine...apparently it can even take long runs ,too. I would still feel better with an oil cooler for that kind of running
Speed is only a matter of money...How fast do you want to go?
- Skootz Kabootz
- Member
- Posts: 4305
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:47 pm
- Location: West Hollywood, CA
- Contact:
- rsrider
- Member
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Lompton Kalifornication
- BuddyRaton
- Scooter Dork
- Posts: 3887
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:08 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, Florida
- Contact:
Two Buddy 125s entered for CBR 2012. I'm interested to see how they do...
in my mirrors of course!
in my mirrors of course!

"Things fall apart - it's scientific" - David Byrne
www.teamscootertrash.com
'06 Cream Buddy 125, 11 Blur 220, 13 BMW C 650 GT, 68 Vespa SS180, 64 Vespa GS MK II, 65 Lambretta TV 175, 67 Vespa GT, 64 Vespa 150 VBB 64 Vespa GL
www.teamscootertrash.com
'06 Cream Buddy 125, 11 Blur 220, 13 BMW C 650 GT, 68 Vespa SS180, 64 Vespa GS MK II, 65 Lambretta TV 175, 67 Vespa GT, 64 Vespa 150 VBB 64 Vespa GL
- ericalm
- Site Admin
- Posts: 16842
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 3:01 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
Re: All about the WOT
The answer is kind of yes and kind of no.Swordsman wrote:So, my question to the scooter gurus is this: just how bad is it to wring the snot out of them? Are these engines weak enough that they run out of rpms before they're dangerously high? Or is running a scooter hard living on borrowed time?
You can run them WOT for long periods without self destructing. You can ride them WOT on a daily basis and be okay.
HOWEVER, if you're running mods or riding at the limits much of the time, it's best to shorten your maintenance intervals. Be diligent about it. You will obviously run through belts, rollers, tires and oil a lot faster than others. Riding around with worn parts means it's only a matter of time before you need a new variator, clutch, etc.
AND, it's better for the scooter to keep it stock. I've nothing against performance mods but if you're installing them so you can thrash the scooter day in/day out, don't expect to not wear out other parts of the scooter much faster. And if you do them, don't get creative or install a bunch of crap from mysterious eBay sellers in Hong Kong.
Eric // LA Scooter Meetup Group // Stella 4T // Vespa LX // Vespa LXS // Honda Helix // some, uh, projects…
- Swordsman
- Member
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:53 pm
- Location: White, GA, USA
- Cheshire
- Member
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:27 pm
- Location: near Asheville, NC
Wipe the grin off your face before riding another 45 min WOT. No, seriously...by the time you've managed that, the engine will have cooled off plenty! 
I changed my oil & filter every 2k miles (full synth). Valve check and CVT look over (belt dust, wear) every 4k, the routine stuff. Most of my riding was WOT on the Buddy. It never complained.

I changed my oil & filter every 2k miles (full synth). Valve check and CVT look over (belt dust, wear) every 4k, the routine stuff. Most of my riding was WOT on the Buddy. It never complained.

- Skootz Kabootz
- Member
- Posts: 4305
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:47 pm
- Location: West Hollywood, CA
- Contact:
- batgirl101
- Member
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:22 am
- Location: San Francisco
- JHScoot
- Member
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:05 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
question about WOT and "jack rabbit" starts from red lights
i do this often cuz i want to get a quick jump out ahead of traffic. but i am not certain i am getting any extra oomph up to 40mph which is my intention. IOW is there any real advantage going WOT from standing start over just some aggressive throttle? i am trying to reason all this. i don't want to cause my engine undue wear and stress but going WOT seems necessary sometimes
on the other hand the little engine seems to spin well up to 40-45mph at WOT but i don't feel its much different in sound or fury from moderate throttle, and aren't sure i am reaching speed from a standstill any quicker
so, i am confused obviously. when to WOT and when to not under ordinary commuting
i do this often cuz i want to get a quick jump out ahead of traffic. but i am not certain i am getting any extra oomph up to 40mph which is my intention. IOW is there any real advantage going WOT from standing start over just some aggressive throttle? i am trying to reason all this. i don't want to cause my engine undue wear and stress but going WOT seems necessary sometimes
on the other hand the little engine seems to spin well up to 40-45mph at WOT but i don't feel its much different in sound or fury from moderate throttle, and aren't sure i am reaching speed from a standstill any quicker
so, i am confused obviously. when to WOT and when to not under ordinary commuting

Riding is riding