Silver Streak wrote:neotrotsky wrote:It's true that reactions on other motorcycle boards for the "new" Vespa concept are cool at best, but on ModernVespa they are ALL nuts about this thing, and pretty down against anyone who thinks it's not the best bike in the show. I mentioned exactly my thoughts and man was I met with some pretty defensive stances. Then again, many modern Vespa riders are very much on board with Piaggio's current styling choices no matter how minor. I just have alot more hope for their designs. This? Meh.
I honestly think Vespa should concentrate on a MORE simple concept. It's a design ethos that did them so well for decades. A 9% power increase only just strangely doesn't strike me as something to be super excited about.
I'm not sure what Modern Vespa board you are reading, but it doesn't seem to be the same one that I am. There is a very healthy debate there about whether or not this is a good effort, and I challenge you to find one poster there who said it's "the best bike in the show." It's a Vespa forum, so
of course there is going to be a bias toward Vespa; there is an equally strong bias toward Genuine/LML here. Personally, I've bought two Vespas and two Genuines in the past few years, and I like them all. So I consider myself pretty neutral.
I think you flatter yourself by contending that your remarks over there produced defensive reactions. My response is probably one of the ones to which you refer. Since when does simple disagreement with your point of view represent defensiveness? Are these not fora for civil discussion about things we don't agree on?
As I pointed out "over there," this scoot is just an updated take on the original Vespa prototype, and that's all they claim it to be. It's also a vehicle for their introduction of their first totally new 125/150cc engine in a decade. Personally, I think that's pretty big news. Since when is a 9% power increase from an engine with no increase in displacement not something to crow a little about?
If you think Vespa's efforts fall short, what do YOU think they should have introduced? I'm curious...
Wow. Defensive much? I mention how LML is actually producing things people have been asking for, and of course the first thing that comes up is the expectation that the electronics will fry and it's an unproven risk just because it's from LML. I mention how it's not that original of style, and by all outward appearance it was just another LEADER motor, and a 9% increase in power is supposed to wow me when outwardly it really didn't make an effort to look improved?
To me, releasing a new improvement on a model is sort of like the V6 Mustang from 2010 to 2012: In 2010, the V6 put out (I believe) 220Hp. OK, but not groundbreaking. Then, the 2012 'stang's V6 puts out nearly 300Hp and 31MPG highway (of course, who drives that carefully in a mustang... but still). To me, THAT is worthy of a feature in a newly designed machine. 9% power increase isn't impressive. It's OK, but I'm sure not going to be wowed by it especially when they haven't given a close up of this new engine in practice. They say it's in there... but it looks more like "concept" model vaporware. You keep insisting 9% power increase is impressive, but honestly, it's not trade show worthy. Yes, I'm expecting alot out of Piaggio, but frankly they're falling short.
Yes, they had a new Beverly to introduce, but in the face of BMW announcing their entrance into the scooter market, LML finally giving customers what they want: Fuel Injected vintage styled steel scooters, and Honda finally making good on large displacement scooters like they have been teasing, it just makes Piaggio look like they haven't been trying very hard.
And, what should they of introduced? I dunno... perhaps ANY of the previous promises of alternative fuel technology? They claim to of been working on electric and hybrid motors, but where are they? Zero motors just unveiled their new line of electric bikes with a 114 mile charge range and a host of new options (
http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/zero ... 012-lineu/) . If they can do that with a price point starting at just under $8k, why can't Piaggio? They're losing ground in their home market in Italy to Honda, and really haven't come out with too much that really thrills. Yes, the Typhoon 125 is cool, but not really pushing the industry like they used to.
As far as style, this concept looks stale. I'm sorry, but it does. Looks like the same kind of stuff that was being cranked out as retro-future concept autos when the Prowler and PT Cruiser came out. Even the seat looks like a half-thought design. That's my opinion of course, but whatever. I think a healthy bit of doubt should be expressed of a good company. I enjoy Piaggio products, so much that I criticize the Piaggio USA management because I want them to do better. Hell, I ride a Vespa still AND have my sights on a Stella to hot rod (after getting my wife on board with the idea after she wanted me to sell my vintage bike due to costs...). But, to honestly think this design, which looks half assed to me, is the "best" Piaggio can do says where the company is at development wise if you ask me, and their loyal customers should demand more.
And, coming out with comments like "I think you flatter yourself" sure makes it sound like you're looking for a fight. For someone who wants civil discourse, you sure know how to bait.