Thanks for the scoop, KRUSTY!!! Wow. Here's couple specs from the Yama-momma site:
2009 Zuma 125
4-Stroke!!!
4-Valve!!!
Fuel Injected
Ceramic-Coated Cylinder
Fuel Capacity 1.6 gal
Fuel Economy** 88 MPG
Seat Height 30.7 in
MSRP* $2,999 (Team Yamaha Blue/White) Available from September 2008
$2,999 (Raven) Available from September 2008
$2,999 (Bright Yellow) Available from September 2008
Whoa!
P.S. The TMax 500 is coming, too -
$7,999 (Deep Blue) Available from July 2008
$8,099 (Cadmium Yellow) Available from July 2008
Last edited by jrsjr on Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:45 am, edited 6 times in total.
It would've been a tough call between my Rattler and a 125cc Zuma... but the 2 stroke would've won me over. Plus the 2t runs great on any gas you can find, the 10.0:1 compression on the Yamaha 4 stroke would need 91 octane
pleasefeedthedog wrote:This may or may not show my ignorance, but isn't fuel injection a rare configuration for this category of ride?
European pollution regs are already stricter than ours. Fuel injection is pretty much the way to go to meet their (and our upcoming) regs, so expect to see it everywhere. For example, all 2008 Harley Davidson motorcycles are fuel injected. Carbs aren't gone yet, but they're on the way out.
ericalm wrote:
This site has the C3 listed under scooter models and all the specs and price are for the US...
For $2100, a 50cc toolbox on wheels can be yours!
Very funny, I was thinking it looks more like a cooler than a toolbox. Anyways, they've had the C3 in the US for a while, I'm just waiting for a 125-200cc version... It will probably never happen and the model will become even less popular than it already is and be discontinued. Oh well, I accept the reality of it. It's just a cryin shame....
Eazy wrote:I'm betting it's probably similar to the 125 Vino.
Which is terrible.
You might lose that bet. See the comparo from the Yamaha site below. The engines are clearly entirely different; 4-valve vs 2-valve, different bore and stroke, EFI vs carb, higher compression ratio. The one thing that does suck is the Zuma still has a drum rear brake.
Attachments
Zuma 125 vs Vino 125.JPG (43.78 KiB) Viewed 1340 times
Eazy wrote:I'm betting it's probably similar to the 125 Vino.
Which is terrible.
You might lose that bet. See the comparo from the Yamaha site below. The engines are clearly entirely different; 4-valve vs 2-valve, different bore and stroke, EFI vs carb, higher compression ratio. The one thing that does suck is the Zuma still has a drum rear brake.